Ungated Post | 03 Aug 2020
The Economic Impact of Reckitt Benckiser in the US
Reckitt Benckiser (RB) may not be a household name in the US, but its products certainly are. As a global health, hygiene and nutrition company, RB manufactures some of the most recognizable brands in the US, including Mucinex, Lysol, Woolite, Finish, Air Wick, and Enfamil. In 2019, American households bought roughly 2 million individual RB products per day, or more than 700 million products a year.
In 2019, we calculate that RB contributed a total of $3.8 billion to the US economy—of which 41% ($1.6 billion) was generated directly by the company’s 21 operational sites across the US.
RB’s operational, procurement, and wage expenditure stimulated economic activity in all 50 states. We find that the biggest GDP impacts occurred in Georgia, Illinois, and New Jersey—between them, these three states accounted for more than 41% of RB’s total economic impact in 2019.
RB also supported more than 25,000 jobs throughout the US economy in 2019—of which 3,933 (16%) were direct employees of the company. RB’s procurement from US suppliers stimulated a further 10,740 jobs, while its payment of wages supported 10,527 jobs in the consumer economy and its supply chains.
Our findings therefore indicate that RB has a “jobs multiplier” of 6.4. This means that for every one person employed by the company, its expenditure supports another 5.4 jobs elsewhere in the US economy.
RB also boosts the long-term productive potential of the US economy by investing in R&D. In 2019, RB invested over $100 million in US-based R&D, and employed 322 R&D staff.
Our economic consulting team are world leaders in quantitative economic analysis, working with clients around the globe and across sectors to build models, forecast markets and evaluate interventions using state-of-the art techniques. Lead consultants on this project were:
Oxford Economics’ team is expert at applying advanced economic tools that provide valuable insights into today’s most pressing business, financial, and policy issues.
To find out more about our capabilities, contact:
EMEA
Sam Moore
+44 (0)207 803 1415
Email
Americas
Hamilton Galloway
+1 (646) 503 3068
Email
Asia
Christie Tang
+852 3974 8841
Email
Related Services
Post
The economic impact of abandoning the WTO
Oxford Economics have been commissioned by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) to provide an independent assessment of the economic impact of WTO dissolution. This report details our findings and the assumptions underpinning our analysis.
Find Out More
Post
The economic impact of the sports activities of public service media
This study shows how the sports activities of public service media supported €4.5 billion of GDP and 57,000 jobs across 31 European countries in 2022. The report also highlights wider economic benefits of public service media sports coverage, such as the way in which it leverages sponsorship income for sports bodies.
Find Out More
Post
Global Trade Education: The role of private philanthropy
Global trade can amplify economic development and poverty alleviation. Capable leaders are required to put in place enabling conditions for trade, but currently these skills are underprovided in developing countries. For philanthropists, investing in trade leadership talent through graduate-level scholarships is an opportunity to make meaningful contributions that can multiply and sustain global economic development.
Find Out More