Recent Release | 07 Jun 2023

Multilateral Development Banks for Global Public Goods

Economic Consulting Team

Oxford Economics

The global challenges of today are transboundary and pose existential risks for our societies and economies – including climate change, biodiversity loss, pandemics, fragility, violence and conflict. In our new flagship report ‘Multilateral Development Banks for Global Public Goods’, commissioned by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) on behalf of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), we show how the World Bank and other Multilateral Development Banks can play a key role in preventing and addressing these crises by supporting the provision and protection of Global Public Goods.

The Covid-19 pandemic and the interventions launched to contain its spread have thrown a sharp spotlight on the critical relevance of Global Public Goods (GPGs). Its devasting impact showed once again that global catastrophes such as the climate crisis or the global credit crunch can only be solved or prevented by concerted global action. This calls for multilateral development banks (MDB) and other multinational organisations to take on a more central role.

While emerging economies and developing countries are often hit hardest by global crises, they also play a key role in achieving the goals that the world has set itself to deal with these shocks. This means that as the leading global development institution, the World Bank can play a key role in preventing these crises by supporting the provision and protection of GPGs in its client countries.

On behalf of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Oxford Economics analysed how MDBs—and especially the World Bank—could foster the provision and protection of GPGs. The recommendations we provide are based on a clear-cut definition of the economic problem that GPGs face: their structural underprovision stems from the fact that an often sizeable part of the benefits delivered by the provision of GPGs benefits other countries rather than the country providing them.

The implication of what economists call cross-country externalities is that the provision of GPGs cannot be left to the market or individual countries and that MDBs and other multilateral organisations must take on a more central, coordinating role.

To download the report or the presentation we shared during the official launch event of the study, please complete the form below.

Johanna Neuhoff

Associate Director of Economic Consulting, Continental Europe

Hannah Zick

Economist, Economic Impact

You might also be interested in

Macroeconomic cost of Hurricane Helene will be small

Hurricane Helene will affect the labor market, consumer spending, housing, corporate profits, and industrial production, but the implications for Q4 GDP are minimal.

Find Out More

People are moving to US metros with high natural hazard risks

Metros with the fastest population growth are among those with the highest natural hazard risks. Using FEMA's National Risk Index, we estimate the share of each metro's GDP expected to be lost on an annual basis due to natural hazards.

Find Out More

Don’t just pack your swimsuit—summer travel plans now mean preparing for heatwaves

Extreme heat is becoming the new normal. Tourism sector needs to make sure they are heat-wave ready.

Find Out More

Freshly rebuilt US chemicals sector poised to outgrow Europe

The chemical industries in the US and EU are at the precipice of a major divergence. We believe that a structural advantage for the US, borne initially of the shale gas boom of the 2010s and more recently from the shift of European consumption towards LNG, will create a growing wedge between the two regions over the medium term. This applies directly to basic chemicals, which use natural gas directly as a feedstock and for industrial heating purposes, with ramifications for more specialised chemicals production which are themselves downstream of basic chemicals.

Find Out More