Recent Release | 27 Jul 2023

Good Practices in the Provision of Global Public Goods: How multilateral development banks build on global public goods in their operations

Economic Consulting Team

Oxford Economics

In our flagship report, ‘Multilateral Development Banks for Global Public Goods’, commissioned by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit on behalf of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, Oxford Economics highlighted the positive role that the use of GPGs can play in preventing and addressing crises that cross national boundaries. As part of that work, we wanted to identify and share promising practices and good examples of how the provision of GPGs can be supported through international funding—and in particular through MDBs.

We gathered a longlist of 99 examples of MDBs supporting GPG provision based on comprehensive desk research and interviews with over 30 key actors in the realm of project development.

From this, we selected 20 case studies to carry out “deep dive” research to showcase good practices of provision of GPGs by MDBs based on whether the intervention:

As a result, we gathered examples of GPG projects supported by MDBs and multilateral institutions at the country level that might not have been intended to only support GPG provision—such as those GPG projects mostly financed via Trust Funds and FIFs—but which also produced high GPG effects by maximising the synergies between national and global benefits.

The case studies are designed to inform stakeholders from MDBs and receiving countries involved in the programming and project designing of development cooperation alike. The case studies showcase promising and highly replicable ways of supporting the provision of GPGs in the MDBs’ country engagement—considering both national and cross-country benefits of an intervention. Furthermore, valuable lessons can be learned on the institutional set-up, financing, quantification etc. concerning the support of GPGs by MDBs.

They include examples of projects in sub-Saharan Africa, East Asia & Pacific, Latin America and the Caribbean, and South Asia, and which covered issues such as climate and the environment, global public health, peace and security, financial resilience, and a fair international trading system.

In a synthesis report, we set out 12 recommendations to organisations implementing GPGs to ensure they maximise the benefits on the ground, based on our findings from the analysis of the case studies. These range from using cost-benefit analysis and focusing on projects with high cross-country benefits to helping coordination of in-country provision and encouraging regional learning.

The expert behind the research

Our economic consulting team are world leaders in quantitative economic analysis, working with clients around the globe and across sectors to build models, forecast markets and evaluate interventions using state-of-the art techniques. Lead consultants on this project were:

Johanna Neuhoff

Associate Director of Economic Consulting, Continental Europe

Hannah Marie Zick
Hannah Zick

Economist, Economic Impact

You might also be interested in

The economic footprint of railway transport in Europe

This study demonstrates the economic importance of railway transport by providing a comprehensive analysis of the economic footprint of railway transport in Europe. We analyse how the railway sector’s activities contributed to GDP and supported jobs across the EU27 in 2023.

Find Out More
Shell’s Socioeconomic Impact in the Netherlands

This report assesses the socioeconomic contributions Shell made in the Netherlands in 2024.

Find Out More
Consulting Report 31 Oct 2025 Powering Low-Income Countries’ AI Opportunity
Powering Low-Income Countries’ AI Opportunity 

Low-income countries could unlock $75T in annual gains through AI, energy access, and finance narrowing global living standard gaps and driving growth.

Find Out More
From ideas to impact: a government leader’s guide to responsible AI implementation

Around the world, governments are increasingly adopting artificial intelligence (AI) — not just to improve efficiency in public services, but to change how they deliver results for citizens. The question is no longer whether AI should be adopted, but how to do so responsibly, effectively and at scale.

Find Out More
[autopilot_shortcode]