Recent Release | 07 Jun 2023
Multilateral Development Banks for Global Public Goods
Economic Consulting Team
Oxford Economics
The global challenges of today are transboundary and pose existential risks for our societies and economies – including climate change, biodiversity loss, pandemics, fragility, violence and conflict. In our new flagship report ‘Multilateral Development Banks for Global Public Goods’, commissioned by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) on behalf of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), we show how the World Bank and other Multilateral Development Banks can play a key role in preventing and addressing these crises by supporting the provision and protection of Global Public Goods.
The Covid-19 pandemic and the interventions launched to contain its spread have thrown a sharp spotlight on the critical relevance of Global Public Goods (GPGs). Its devasting impact showed once again that global catastrophes such as the climate crisis or the global credit crunch can only be solved or prevented by concerted global action. This calls for multilateral development banks (MDB) and other multinational organisations to take on a more central role.
While emerging economies and developing countries are often hit hardest by global crises, they also play a key role in achieving the goals that the world has set itself to deal with these shocks. This means that as the leading global development institution, the World Bank can play a key role in preventing these crises by supporting the provision and protection of GPGs in its client countries.
On behalf of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Oxford Economics analysed how MDBs—and especially the World Bank—could foster the provision and protection of GPGs. The recommendations we provide are based on a clear-cut definition of the economic problem that GPGs face: their structural underprovision stems from the fact that an often sizeable part of the benefits delivered by the provision of GPGs benefits other countries rather than the country providing them.
The implication of what economists call cross-country externalities is that the provision of GPGs cannot be left to the market or individual countries and that MDBs and other multilateral organisations must take on a more central, coordinating role.
The expert behind the research
Our economic consulting team are world leaders in quantitative economic analysis, working with clients around the globe and across sectors to build models, forecast markets and evaluate interventions using state-of-the art techniques. The lead consultant on this project was:
Johanna Neuhoff
Associate Director of Economic Consulting, Continental Europe
Hannah Zick
Economist, Economic Impact
Tags:
You might also be interested in
Key take-aways from COP30
COP 30’s agenda had placed a strong emphasis on countries’ implementation of their emissions reduction target and, for the first time, several workstreams included discussions on unilateral trade policies.
Find Out More
Flooding risks diverge across UK cities, sectors and economies
Climate-linked flooding is becoming more severe, reshaping risks for UK cities, real estate, and local economies. Which areas face the greatest impact—and why?
Find Out More
COP 30 in focus: How to stay the course on the path to Net Zero
EMDEs are projected to account for 70% of global CO₂ emissions by 2050, making accelerated emissions reductions in these economies essential. Yet gaps in AE leadership—such as US policy rollbacks and insufficient climate finance—risk slowing the global transition.
Find Out More
Advanced economy leadership is key to the low-carbon transition
We modelled how advanced-economy leadership in innovation and finance could accelerate a global low-carbon transition.
Find Out More
