The UK’s Investment Shortfall
Why it persists, and what a sustained rise in investment would mean
On behalf of a consortium of the UK’s largest private infrastructure investors and operators – Manchester Airports Group, London Gatwick, Getlink, London St Pancras Highspeed, Eurostar and the Global Infrastructure Investor Association – Oxford Economics examined why the UK has invested less than almost every comparable economy for at least a quarter of a century, and what closing that shortfall would be worth.
The report benchmarks UK total and business investment against the G7 and OECD over 2000–2025, by component and by asset type. It finds the shortfall is broad-based but concentrated in business investment – the only component whose gap with the rest of the G7 has widened – and in long-lived physical assets rather than intangibles. Had the UK invested at the G7 average rate since 2000, cumulative investment would have been around £1.9 trillion higher, and the UK’s productive capital stock is now the smallest in the G7 relative to GDP.
Drawing on evidence from the IMF, OECD, Bank of England, OBR and National Infrastructure Commission, the report identifies three features of the investment environment that consistently set the UK apart: the burden and design of recurrent taxes on business property, the cost of delivering and operating new capacity, and policy unpredictability. Using the Oxford Economics Global Economic Model, it then quantifies a scenario in which UK business investment converges on the G7 average by 2040, all but closing the total investment gap. Real GDP ends the period 1.7% above baseline, the productive capital stock is 8.7% larger, and real household disposable income is 2.1% higher – around £1,540 per household – with the gains permanent rather than cyclical.
The report does not prescribe a programme of reform. It offers a test by which proposals can be judged: whether they raise the return each pound of investment can earn, lower the cost of delivering it, or improve confidence in the environment over the life of an asset. It was published ahead of the Autumn Budget, as the Government weighs its response to the business rates call for evidence and the implementation of recent planning, grid and energy-cost measures.
THIS REPORT WAS BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE MACRO CONSULTING SERVICE TEAM
The experts behind the research
Get in touch
Learn more about this report or how our team could support you: