What Trump 2.0 would mean for European growth
A second Trump presidency could have a moderate impact on European growth based on our simulation of his proposed policies. In the most extreme protectionist scenario, the eurozone economy would be 0.4% smaller than in our baseline forecast by 2029.
What you will learn:
- Our estimates are based on two scenarios. The first, a ‘limited Trump’ scenario, assumes targeted rises in tariffs, limits on immigration, and fiscal loosening. These policies result in a very small hit to European growth. The second, a ‘full-blown Trump’ scenario, includes more aggressive measures on all fronts, leading to a more negative impact on European growth.
- While higher tariffs reduce trade, expansionary fiscal policy in the US causes the reverse effect through stronger external demand for European goods. In the ‘limited’ scenario this is sufficient to partially offset the impact from tariffs. But in the ‘full-blown’ scenario, the negative hit to US growth means a large fall in European exports.
- The impacts of a second Trump presidency would be uneven across countries, with the most open economies generally hit harder. GDP in Ireland, the Netherlands, and Sweden would be cut by 0.6%; at the other end of the spectrum, Italy and Portugal would be less affected. Among the largest economies, Germany would suffer the biggest drop in GDP, with the economy 0.4% smaller than in our baseline by 2029.
- Despite the imposition of higher tariffs, we think the impact of these scenarios would not be inflationary for Europe, as reduced demand and lower commodity prices would more than offset higher import costs.
For more on the US presidential election, visit our topic page.
Tags:
Related Resources
Toss-up US elections increase downside risks again for our Q3 IFRS 9 and CECL scenarios
While our short-term outlook for the global economy has largely remained steady over the past quarter, the balance of risks around the base case has become more negative. This is evidenced by the number of clients expressing increased pessimism in their expectations around global growth in our latest Global Risk Survey.
Find Out MoreRisks to US industry from election skew to the downside
Our baseline forecast is for some form of divided government that will not alter the current trajectory of industrial growth. If either side achieves a governing trifecta and fully implements its agenda there are, however, differences: the growth consequences are mostly negative under former president Trump and mostly positive (albeit very marginal) under Vice President Harris.
Find Out MoreAssessing the impact of a Trump vs. Harris presidency for Canada
While a Kamala Harris presidency wouldn't materially alter the economic outlook for Canada. Another term for Donald Trump would usher in stiff tariffs and a renewed era of global uncertainty that would likely mean higher inflation, tighter monetary policy, and slower economic growth relative to our baseline.
Find Out MoreAssessing the impact of a Trump vs. Harris presidency for Canada
A Kamala Harris presidency wouldn't materially alter the economic outlook for Canada. Another term for Donald Trump would usher in stiff tariffs and a renewed era of global uncertainty that would likely mean higher inflation, tighter monetary policy, and slower economic growth relative to our baseline.
Find Out More