Recent release | 03 Mar 2014
The Cost of Brain Drain


Firms have long understood that losing staff is a key risk to success, but the financial cost of staff turnover has received little attention.
Working with Unum, this report analyses the financial impact of staff turnover across five key sectors (IT/Tech, Accounting, Legal, Media/Advertising and Retail). These costs are split into two main components. Firstly, and most importantly, is the cost of lost output while a new worker gets up to the standard expected of them (“optimal productivity”). The second, which is probably more familiar, is the logistical cost of finding and absorbing a new worker.
These costs vary substantially across three key variables – the sector in question, the size of the firm hiring a new employee, and the background of the worker being recruited.
Our report for Unum used a bespoke survey dataset as well as official data from the Labour Force Survey to analyse the costs firms in five key sectors face when they replace professional workers. The report attracted extensive national press coverage, including in the Financial Times, the Independent and the Telegraph, as well as in several recruitment and HR related publications.
Related Services

Post
UK Labour market data woes show the importance of nowcasts
We think that valid concerns about the quality of data from the UK's Labour Force Survey (LFS) make it virtually unusable at present. Considering it will likely take another two years to fix the problems, this poses a major headache for policymakers and economists alike.
Find Out More
Post
Reuters: Sharp downgrades to US unit labor costs bode well for inflation outlook
"The labor market and wage growth are receding as a source of inflationary pressures," said Nancy Vanden Houten, Lead US Economist at Oxford Economics.
Find Out More
Post
What US federal government employment cuts will mean
The risks around the forecast for federal government employment are skewed to the downside because of the limited scope for stronger federal hiring and the potential for more aggressive efforts by a second Donald Trump presidency to reduce payroll.
Find Out More