Indonesia | Delayed fiscal consolidation unlikely to raise debt risks
Due to ongoing pandemic-related spending needs, we now expect Indonesia’s fiscal deficit will narrow to 3% of GDP only by 2024, a year later than we anticipated last year. Our latest forecast assumes a slight fiscal expansion in 2021 and a gradual reduction in deficits from 2022 onwards.
What you will learn:
- Deficit reduction will rely heavily on expenditure
consolidation. While the government’s new tax measures will help boost revenues to some degree, lack of compliance and distortionary exemptions are chronic problems in Indonesia’s tax system. Therefore, we forecast only a moderate rise in tax revenues-to-GDP ratio in the medium-term.
- The government will likely have to re-visit its three-year timeline of reinstating the 3% fiscal deficit ceiling rule by 2023. But we estimate government debt will remain below its 60% of GDP threshold if the authorities stick to fiscal consolidation even with some delays in meeting the deficit target.
- We expect the central bank will continue to help fund fiscal deficits through 2022, in line with the government’s plan. While we forecast Indonesia’s longterm bond yields will rise in line with global rates, debt dynamics will become more favorable with the interest rate-growth differential turning negative from 2022 onwards.
High debt costs suggest European office price correction
Our analysis suggests a 10% correction is needed on average for the major office markets in Europe to compensate for the higher cost of debt, with prime yields required to soften by 10bps-75bps to generate a low-risk interest coverage ratio at a reasonable LTV.Find Out More
Why an ageing population doesn’t mean soaring inflation
What’s the future for inflation? Joachim Nagel, the new president of Germany's central bank, believes the rapidly ageing global population will play a key role – ramping up pressure on prices in the medium term. While we agree slowing labour supply will stifle output growth, in his recent discussion Nagel failed to fully consider the demand side of the argument.Find Out More