Blog | 17 Jan 2025

Buckle up: Trump era brings economic uncertainty to cybersecurity

Teri Robinson

Managing Editor, Thought Leadership

Elections have consequences. With President-elect Donald Trump promising wide-ranging tariffs, mass deportations of undocumented workers, and adjustments to the Inflation Reduction Act and CHIPS Act, the changes ahead could be substantial. In this second installment of a two-part series, Senior Editor Teri Robinson spoke with Chief US Economist Ryan Sweet about the what the second Trump administration will mean for cybersecurity, including the shifting responsibilities of defenders the safety of critical infrastructure, and the rise of AI. An edited transcript of their conversation follows.

As cybersecurity threats have become more frequent, sophisticated, and destructive, businesses have grown increasingly concerned over potential attacks that can result in crippling downtime. According to research from Oxford Economics on the hidden costs of businesses getting knocked out of service, unplanned downtime costs the Global 2000 $400 billion annually. Executives—particularly Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs), have felt the pressure to lock down security in their organizations as regulators like those at the SEC moved to hold them personally responsible for quickly remediating cybersecurity incidents.

The meteoric rise of generative AI also has put executives on high alert. Even as businesses are intrigued by and have bought into the inarguable promise offered by generative AI, more than half of businesses surveyed by Oxford Economics for an AI Maturity Index say potential cybersecurity issues have kept them from adopting AI more quickly. That concern is even stronger among those companies that lead in AI maturity—63% (vs. 52% overall) cite cybersecurity as the top risk of AI.

If the incoming administration decides to relax regulations, though, those concerns may dissipate—but at a high potential risk if reduced scrutiny leads to relaxed security.

TR: What are the potential repercussions of imposing stiff tariffs and deregulation that could affect tech and, in particular, cybersecurity?

RS: Trade wars aren’t isolated to trade. They affect the flow of goods and services, financial markets vis a vis interest rates, stock prices, and exchange rates. One of the biggest downsides to tariff increases and deregulation is the potential risk to US cybersecurity. Deregulating the tech industry or putting more of the onus on businesses to defend themselves with their own cybersecurity without federal oversight could leave the US more vulnerable.

TR: The uptick in cybersecurity events has put businesses on their toes. How do economists view the problem, and what types of attacks could have the greatest economic impact?

RS: It’s like supply chain shocks. They’re happening more frequently, are more disruptive, and have a larger impact on the economy. Oxford Economics did a cyber scenario that I think is still the most comprehensive economic study I’ve seen on cybersecurity, and it showed the economic costs can be significant. High up on my list are Black Swan events. A cyberattack on part of the US energy grid, either in the Northeast or in the West, could potentially have enormous economic implications very quickly. To put this into perspective, the blizzard that hit the Northeast in January 2016 cost the regional economy around $3 billion because of power outages and business closures. This would be a drop in the bucket if there were to be a cyberattack on the Northeast electrical grid that caused a prolonged disruption. We also learned a lesson when the Texas grid went down in 2021. It wasn’t cyber-related, but it showed what kind of damage could be done, crippling businesses, prompting bankruptcies and resulting in property loss. The Dallas Federal Reserve estimated the outages cost the Texas economy between $80-$130 billion.

And those kinds of attacks could be exacerbated by aging infrastructure. There’s been a lot of emphasis on US infrastructure—the Inflation Reduction Act, the CHIPS Act to various degrees, a bipartisan infrastructure bill—but a lot of our infrastructure is still old. And we’re trying to figure out how the Trump administration will handle that.

TR: From an economist’s perspective what else needs to be protected beyond what is considered traditional infrastructure?

RS: From a macroeconomic perspective, protecting your infrastructure, protecting the flow of credit, it’s far-reaching. We’ve talked about the energy grid on the Northeast and the West, but protecting the Federal Reserve is crucial. If the payment system goes down, it can be catastrophic, particularly for small business.

TR: What are the implications of deregulation for AI?

RS: If there are fewer guardrails, that can be problematic. Historically, during periods where we shifted from over-regulation to deregulation it planted the seeds for problems down the road—for example, lax regulation around the housing bubble that led to the Savings and Loan crisis. With AI, if you don’t have these guardrails, you could lay the groundwork for bigger problems like privacy incidents, breaches, and hallucinations that could compromise business decisions.

TR: How can companies prepare for a shift in policies, particularly when it comes to deregulation of cybersecurity?

RS: It’s all about navigating uncertainty. As an economist, I believe incentives matter and typically win the day. So even if the federal government deemphasizes cybersecurity or putting more safeguards in place, there’s a significant incentive for businesses to do it themselves. Businesses want to protect their intellectual property and their customers because if your customers don’t trust you, you’re not going to be in business very long. When a company is attacked, its reputation is damaged and it is very costly to repair.

Author

Teri Robinson

Managing Editor, Thought Leadership

+1 347 254 7522

Teri Robinson

Managing Editor, Thought Leadership

New York, United States

Teri oversees all technology research programmes on the Oxford Economics Thought Leadership team. She is an award-winning cybersecurity and tech content specialist, journalist, and screenwriter who, for the better part of the last decade, led editorial for SC Media, a top-ranking cybersecurity news outlet. Her work has appeared in the New York Times, Inc. magazine and a wide variety of leading B2B titles. Her corporate clients have included Microsoft, Cisco, Iron Mountain, IBM, AT&T and American Express.

Ryan Sweet

Chief US Economist

+1 (646) 668 5790

Ryan Sweet

Chief US Economist

New York, United States

Ryan Sweet is the Chief US Economist at Oxford Economics. He is responsible for forecasting and assessing the US macroeconomic outlook and how it will influence monetary policy and financial markets. Ryan is among the most accurate high-frequency forecasters of the U.S. economy, according to MarketWatch and Bloomberg LP.

Prior to joining Oxford Economics, Ryan led real-time economics at Moody’s Analytics and was a member of the U.S. macroeconomics team. He was also head of the firm’s monetary policy research, following actions by the Federal Reserve and examining its potential impact on the U.S. economy.

Ryan is an adjunct professor in the Economics and Finance Department at West Chester University of Pennsylvania. He received a master’s degree in finance from John’s Hopkins University, a master’s degree in economics from the University of Delaware, and a bachelor’s degree in economics from Washington College.

You may be interested in

Post

The Estimation Game: What do business transformations really cost?

Oxford Economics, SAP Signavio, and LeanIX partnered to conduct fresh research on business transformation and everything that these journeys entail. The report, based on a survey of 800 executives, reveals key insights into establishing clear goals, securing workforce buy-in, and managing risks, with a spotlight on how organizations can transform successfully despite common hurdles like cost overruns and data management challenges.

Find Out More

Post

Buckle up: Trump era brings economic uncertainty

Elections have consequences, and inaugurating a new president means policy change will soon follow.

Find Out More

Post

Tech spend: Driving growth and resilience through economic downturns

How organizations invest in technology during economic downturns can be a strong indicator of their performance during hard times and the recoveries that follow. Our study presents a significant new dataset of technology spending from publicly available industry data to extract key lessons for investment strategies across a broad spectrum of industries and product categories in advanced economies.

Find Out More