Recent Release | 12 Dec 2022
Crisis resilience of the construction industry
Economic Consulting Team
Oxford Economics
Despite the Covid-19 pandemic, the German construction industry developed positively in 2020 and 2021 supporting the overall economy during the crisis. The study took this as an opportunity to take a closer look at the extent and determinants of the crisis resilience of the German construction industry in various crises and a European comparison.
The construction industry is often seen as a pillar of macroeconomic development during economic crises. Against this background, the question arises of how resilient the German construction industry has been in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic. Using current data, the study aimed at analysing the consequences of past economic crises and which factors and instruments can enhance the resilience of construction companies in coping with past and future crises.
Although each crisis is unique and requires different responses, there are certainly “universal” factors that improve the crisis resilience of companies. These include the strategic safeguarding of liquidity, the management and control of key operating figures, the reduction of structural dependencies through diversification – including customer segments, sales markets, financiers, and suppliers – strategic relationship and reputation management and access to external advice. We also recommend that construction companies adapt early to trends that harbour crisis potential. Particularly concerning the potential risk of climate change and digitalisation, the findings indicate that the construction industry still has some catching up to do.
At the sector level, our empirical findings also indicated that diversifying markets was an effective means of increasing the sector’s resilience. In contrast, a high share of large, young, and potentially less-solvent firms reduced the sector’s resilience. In addition, the sector’s availability of skilled labour played a crucial role: a high share of vacant positions and a higher share of workers with a higher education level tended to reduce resilience by reducing a company’s flexibility in responding to a crisis. Furthermore, factors that cannot be influenced by the companies themselves played a central role. Factors indicating an overheating and the formation of housing bubbles in the construction and real estate industry tended to reduce the overall resilience of the industry.
About the team
Our Economic Consulting team are world leaders in quantitative economic analysis, working with clients around the globe and across sectors to build models, forecast markets and evaluate interventions using state-of-the art techniques. Lead consultants on this project were:
Johanna Neuhoff
Associate Director of Economic Consulting, Continental Europe
Hannah Marie Zick
Economist, Economic Impact
You might be interested in
What does Trump 2.0 mean for construction globally?
The election of Donald Trump will affect global construction activity through fiscal stimulus, curbed immigration, increased tariffs, and policy decisions.
Find Out MoreA capital is born: The impact of Indonesia moving its capital city
Indonesia is planning to move its capital to Nusantara. However, this move is not expected to fully replace Jakarta's economic role as or solve all its problems.
Find Out MoreAPAC Global Construction Outlook Chartbook
Discover the latest insights into the upgraded global construction outlook with our exclusive chartbook. Delve into visual representations of key data points and trends to gain a comprehensive understanding of the industry's growth trajectory in 2024 and beyond.
Find Out MoreSizeable backlog supporting European building construction activity
A substantial backlog of work is supporting building construction activity in the face of falling permits. Building companies in the EU report a 11.5-month backlog of work, up from an average of 9.5 months in the decade before the coronavirus pandemic.
Find Out More