Blog | 25 Aug 2021

Construction’s productivity problem requires technology-based solutions

Toby Wittington

Toby Whittington

Lead Economist

Construction site

The construction sector has been one of the most resilient areas of the economy during the pandemic. As many other areas of the economy had to suspend operations, the construction sector benefitted from the fact that most work takes place outside (meaning less onerous distancing restrictions) and because much construction work is viewed as essential for a functioning economy.

But as the world emerges from the pandemic, perhaps the most important issue facing the construction sector will be productivity—or lack thereof. Productivity in construction has generally lagged other sectors over the past 30 years. Unlike the manufacturing sector, which has seen consistent productivity growth since 1990 as new efficiency-enhancing techniques have been rolled out on the factory floor, the nature of the building process means similar efficiency improvements are much harder to implement in the construction sector. Each new building is a standalone project rather than another unit of output on a continuous factory production line. The high levels of differentiation across building construction limits the amount of repeatable efficiency savings that can take place. This has meant that construction has remained relatively labour intensive, a point that has made this sector so vulnerable to labour supply shortages, particularly in western countries.

chart_Construction’s productivity problem requires technology-based solutions

New technologies are emerging that will need to be adopted if the global construction sector is to improve its poor productivity performance. Over the next decade countries will increasingly look to prefabricated construction as a pillar in national homebuilding strategies. Unlike traditionally built houses, prefabricated homes will benefit from economies of scale in the manufacturing process and significantly alleviate the labour constraints currently facing construction markets in many countries.

The use of 3D printing and robotics will also be central to addressing construction’s productivity problem. Though still in its infancy, there have been successful examples of 3D-printed buildings around the world, and the technology offers numerous advantages over traditional building methods. Foremost among these advantages is speed—a recent example of a 46-square-metre concrete barracks being erected in under 40 hours by a US military team points to the potential of the technology. And the degree of automation, with programmable design and robotics, will reduce the need for labour input and help to offset labour constraints.

Beyond enhancing productivity, introduction of these new technologies will help reduce the sector’s carbon emissions output. 3D printing requires low energy input and offers a leaner approach—specific parts can be custom-made as they’re needed rather than pre-ordered in bulk, resulting in reduced waste. This will be important going forward as the construction sector seeks to reduce its carbon footprint; data from the UK shows average construction sector emissions growing by 0.2% per year over the last 15 years. By contrast, manufacturing, through the implementation of efficiency saving techniques, managed to reduce emissions by an average of 3% per year over the same time period.

Over the next decade, we expect these productivity-enhancing measures will increasingly become part of the construction process. The UK government has mandated that 25% of all new affordable housing must be modular, which will likely be necessary if the government is to meet its stated ambition of 300,000 new homes per year. Currently, less than 10% of UK new builds contain modular elements, compared with 20% in Germany and 85% in Sweden. Furthermore, 3D printing technology is to see increased use across the construction sector, from homebuilding to major infrastructure projects such as with the HS2 project.

If the construction goals of developed countries are to be met, then inevitably the implementation of these new technologies will be paramount. Globally, we expect to see construction firms increasingly implementing these new technologies into their operations in order to meet the construction challenges of the next decade.

You may be interested in


Will Europe’s green future survive Russia’s war in Ukraine?

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine continues to sow economic disruption around the world. One long-term problem the conflict could exacerbate is climate change, as Europe slows its transition from fossil fuels in the scramble for alternatives to Russian energy—though the grim events of 2022 could yet end up accelerating a greener future.

Find Out More


A perfect storm for real estate means rethinking EU infrastructure drive

As Europe’s real estate decision-makers return to their offices in the coming weeks, they’ll find several factors key for developments’ financial viability have worsened through the summer. The months ahead may see difficult discussions being made around which developments should still go ahead in 2023. And policy-makers need to ensure support for post-COVID recovery doesn’t make matters worse.

Find Out More


In the teeth of a real estate price correction as debt costs rise

Global commercial property prices were barely affected by the pandemic despite the fall in output and changes in the structure of the economy, such as the heightened demand for goods over services and increased home working. But higher interest rates in the wake of the pandemic are changing this picture and bringing a belated impact back to commercial property markets. High debt costs suggest a pricing correction is needed, with US industrial real estate to move 13% lower and European office properties 12.5% lower according to our estimates, based on the best buildings in gateway markets.

Find Out More