Few policy issues are attracting more attention than how to leverage the post-COVID recovery to accelerate the transition to a low-carbon economy. Europe’s Green Deal aims to mobilise €1trn in sustainable investment over the coming decade, President Biden campaigned on a promise to unleash $2trn in clean investment in the US over his first term, and Japan’s ruling party has urged its leadership to follow suit with a fund “comparable to global standards” to help finance Japan’s low-carbon transition.
These major investment programmes are a key step to a low-carbon future. But financing the transition might be less daunting in advanced economies—where the burden of servicing government debt has consistently eased through the past couple of decades—than in emerging economies, where sovereign risk has risen over the last year. Even though financial conditions for emerging markets remain relatively favourable for now, governments in emerging economies will be conscious of the need to narrow fiscal deficits, reduce debt burdens, and steer key sovereign risk metrics back in a favourable direction. So financing the transition may take a back seat to balancing the books, at least in the short term.
The current economic landscape also provides China with an important opportunity—to deliver on President Xi’s 2019 pledge to build “high-quality, sustainable, risk-resistant, reasonably priced, and inclusive infrastructure” across the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Our 2019 report, Belt and Road Green Finance Index, highlighted the financial constraints many countries in the Belt and Road will face in shifting to low carbon—challenges that have only intensified by the events of the past year. But our report also looked at the potential role for China and other BRI members to support this transition via financial support and technological diffusion.
What specifically could China do? One option would be to accelerate investment in clean energy along the Belt and Road, which understandably stalled in 2020. But even before the pandemic, alternatives only formed a small part of China’s outbound energy investment. This contrasts with its domestic achievements—China has gone from almost a standing start in 2015 to having as much installed solar capacity as the US and Europe put together, and in 2019 added more than Japan, India, South Korea, Australia and Vietnam combined. By providing the financial inputs and know-how, and working with local labour, China could support a powerful short-term driver of recovery. For example, an analysis of Cyprus by the World Bank found that incentivising solar capacity installation had the greatest short-term employment impact among a range of “Green Recovery” measures, and by far the greatest long-term carbon savings.
Supporting short-term demand at the same time as accelerating the transition to clean energy would clearly be a win-win for China’s Belt and Road partners, as well as the global recovery and transition to low carbon. China could prioritise this in its outbound investment though 2021, and arrive at November’s COP 26 having demonstrated a leadership role in supporting the transition in emerging economies. Will China take up the challenge?
You may be interested in
Global Industry: Energy transition will transform mining—promise and pitfalls
We expect that demand for energy transition-related critical minerals will grow significantly in the next decades even in the absence of rapid progress required to achieve net zero.Find Out More
The costs and eventual benefits of smooth decarbonisation in ASEAN
Reaching net zero carbon emissions by 2050 would likely have a larger impact on economic activity initially in ASEAN5 countries than more gradual decarbonisation. But our modelling suggests the gap would narrow in later years and turn positive in most places approaching 2050.Find Out More
Why understanding and investing in your social footprint is good for business
In the last few years issues such as the cost of living crisis, and the Covid-19 pandemic have pushed the nature of the relationship between companies and their employees, communities, and wider political context to the top of boardrooms’ agenda.Find Out More