How the World Bank supports projects with global benefits
Commissioned by the German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ)
How can countries be encouraged to invest in projects that benefit the wider world? The World Bank’s Framework for Financial Incentives (FFI) offers an innovative approach by making financing more attractive for projects addressing climate change, biodiversity loss and other global challenges. This independent assessment, funded by BMZ and implemented by GIZ, finds encouraging early progress and identifies practical ways to strengthen the framework’s reach and effectiveness.
Building on Oxford Economics’ expertise in financing global public goods, this assessment examines the FFI’s early progress. Drawing on project data and consultations with project teams and experts, it explores how projects are selected, how financial support is allocated and where the framework can add the most value.
The FFI helps countries invest in projects that deliver benefits both at home and across borders. For projects financed by the World Bank’s International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), it offers additional borrowing capacity, longer repayment periods and financial support that reduces borrowing costs.
Across its first five funding rounds, the framework received 48 applications and approved 33, covering all seven World Bank regions. Climate change was the most commonly addressed challenge. Approved projects generally scored more highly on expected cross-border benefits than rejected projects, suggesting that support is reaching projects with greater potential global benefits.
Feedback from project teams and technical experts is encouraging. They report that incentives have helped ease funding constraints, increase project scale and support more ambitious designs. The framework has also encouraged teams to consider cross-border benefits more systematically and opened discussions with borrowing countries about investments whose wider value might otherwise receive less attention.
The findings also highlight opportunities for further development. Many initial applications involved projects already well advanced in planning, limiting the framework’s scope to strengthen their cross-border benefits from the outset. Earlier engagement, better tools for measuring these benefits and clearer assessments of financing needs could help target incentives more effectively.
The experts behind the research
Get in touch
Learn more about this report or how our team could support you: