How to improve the fiscal rules
Reforms to the UK’s fiscal framework would help put the public finances on a more sustainable path and provide a better platform for a much-needed strategy to improve the economy’s supply side, in our view.
Specifically, we think the UK should have three fiscal rules: to improve public sector net worth over a five-10-year horizon; to aim for a cyclically adjusted current balance each year; and to cut public debt on a three-year horizon.
To reduce undesirable feedback from monetary policy to fiscal policy, the debt target should exclude the effects of transfers from the Bank of England’s asset purchase facility. There should also be an escape clause to allow more time to achieve the deficit and debt targets if monetary policy is seriously constrained by the effective lower bound.
In addition, the OBR should extend its forecast horizon to 10 years to allow a better assessment of the longer-term impact of supply-side policies, including public investment, and introduce a formal ‘yellow card’ scheme to highlight persistent slippage from the fiscal plans.
Changes along these lines would not remove the need to implement further fiscal tightening to prevent public debts from trending higher. But they would help ensure medium-term fiscal sustainability, while allowing more scope to lift public investment as part of a comprehensive strategy to lift the UK’s potential growth.
Tags:
Related posts
Post
VAT gap in the EU: 2024 report
The EU VAT Gap 2024 report offers an extensive analysis of the value-added tax (VAT) compliance and policy gaps across the EU. As part of a larger consortium, Oxford Economics analysed the discrepancy between the theoretical VAT Total Tax Liability (VTTL) and actual revenue collected, providing insights into compliance inefficiencies and policy-induced revenue losses.
Find Out MorePost
Perception versus reality for US DOGE
The creation of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), along with the incoming Treasury secretary's goal of halving the deficit as a share of GDP, lend downside risk to our baseline forecast for federal spending.
Find Out MorePost
What US federal government employment cuts will mean
The risks around the forecast for federal government employment are skewed to the downside because of the limited scope for stronger federal hiring and the potential for more aggressive efforts by a second Donald Trump presidency to reduce payroll.
Find Out More