Recent Release | 30 Jun 2020
The Economic Impact of Restricting Competition in 5G Network Equipment
Economic Consulting Team
Oxford Economics
A new report by Oxford Economics sheds light on the potential costs of restricting competition in the provision of 5G network equipment across 31 European countries. The study models the consequences for investment costs, rollout delays, and long-term productivity losses in the EU-27 countries plus Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.
The next generation of mobile technology offers enormous opportunities for countries who facilitate its widespread provision. During the global coronavirus crisis, telecoms networks have kept vital health, education and emergency services online, helped many businesses to shift smoothly to remote working patterns, and enabled friends and family to stay connected.
The associated recession is set to delay the rollout of 5G, endangering the extent to which these opportunities can be realised.
In Europe as well as globally, the market is dominated by three players: Ericsson, Huawei and Nokia. However, the participation of one of these companies – Huawei – in the rollout of 5G is likely to be constrained by a series of political decisions. As of June 2020, a number of governments in Europe are still reviewing its participation by balancing security implications against other economic and industrial priorities.
While it is widely accepted that such restrictions will be costly to businesses and consumers alike, there has been no systematic attempt to quantify the potential scale of these effects in Europe. In this context, Huawei commissioned Oxford Economics to assess the economic cost of restricting competition in 31 European markets. To reflect the uncertainties inherent in this analysis, the study models three alternative scenarios – termed “low cost”, “central cost”, and “high cost”.
Under the central cost scenario, the report suggests that restricting a key supplier of 5G infrastructure in the 31 European countries would increase total investment costs by almost €3 billion per year, on average, over the next decade (in 2020 prices). This represents an annual real cost increase of 19% which translates to €3 million per year in Iceland, but as much as €479 million per year in Germany.
Furthermore, the restriction in competition would lead to rollout delays across Europe. Under the central cost scenario, an estimated 56 million fewer people would be covered by the 5G network in 2023. Such a delay would also result in slower technological innovation and reduced economic growth. In the same scenario, national GDP in the year 2035 is reduced by some €6.9 bn in Germany and €7.3 billion in France. Across all 31 European countries modelled, the total GDP lost in 2035 is put at €40 billion (in 2020 prices).
About the team
Our economic consulting team are world leaders in quantitative economic analysis, working with clients around the globe and across sectors to build models, forecast markets and evaluate interventions using state-of-the art techniques. Lead consultants on this project were:
Henry Worthington
Director, Economic Consulting
+44 (0) 203 910 8061
Henry Worthington
Director, Economic Consulting
London, United Kingdom
Henry Worthington is a Director for Economic Consulting in Oxford Economics’ consultancy division managing a team of economists in London across a diverse range of projects featuring economic impact modelling, macroeconomic modelling and forecasting and scenario analysis.
He joined Oxford Economics in September 2008, originally as part of the global macroeconomics team. As part of the macro team Henry assumed forecasting responsibility for a number of countries including Russia, Poland and Hungary. In May 2010, Henry moved to the consultancy team. He has since lead and managed a wide range of projects notably an evaluation of the economic benefits of unconventional oil and gas extraction in Tunisia, research into the economic impact of hotel investments on behalf of the IFC, building a macroeconomic model for forecasting and scenario analysis in Abu Dhabi and developing a macroeconomic model to assess the implications of the introduction of VAT in the Bahamas.
Henry was educated at the University of Cambridge, where he gained a first-class degree in Economics, becoming the William Stone Scholar of Economics, and an MPhil in Modern Society and Global Transformations.
Related Services
Post
Global Trade Education: The role of private philanthropy
Global trade can amplify economic development and poverty alleviation. Capable leaders are required to put in place enabling conditions for trade, but currently these skills are underprovided in developing countries. For philanthropists, investing in trade leadership talent through graduate-level scholarships is an opportunity to make meaningful contributions that can multiply and sustain global economic development.
Find Out More
Post
Mapping the Plastics Value Chain: A framework to understand the socio-economic impacts of a production cap on virgin plastics
The International Council of Chemical Associations (ICCA) commissioned Oxford Economics to undertake a research program to explore the socio-economic and environmental implications of policy interventions that could be used to reduce plastic pollution, with a focus on a global production cap on primary plastic polymers.
Find Out More
Post
The Economic Contribution of Mexico’s Audiovisual Industry
This report demonstrates the integral role that the AV industry plays in Mexico's economy by estimating the industry’s domestic economic footprint. The analysis comprises all aspects of the audiovisual industry, including film production, distribution, and exhibition; the production, distribution, and broadcast of television content on free-to-air and pay TV channels; and online video platforms. Our estimates provide a recent snapshot of the audiovisual industry, including impacts at the broader industry level and broken out by sub-sector.
Find Out More